![]() ![]() Lets see the textual myopia & mental gymnastics charlatans wanna do around this notion of Lot being the one raped by women. What David did was extremely unholy, in fact criminal, because he deserved to die, but lost his own son instead (2Sam12:14-23).Īnother good point made was how Lot was made drunk by his daughters & was raped by them & ended up getting them pregnant (Gen19:33), yet he's called righteous in the NT (2Peter2:7), nice. If Nathan hadn't of told David about his sin he probably would've just kept his sin secret. ![]() Obviously the prophet Nathan was used to turn David around, but David's response was that of a person who believed in fairness & was big on it & when the penny dropped he realized how he had tried to cover up his premeditated murder (2Sam12:1-13). Of course the fruit inspectors would mention how David was a model prayer (Psalm51), but they'd have to recognize that Psalm 51 was produced through God's providence. I'm sure most secularists would slander David as sleazy. He was spoilt for women, yet had to take another man's wife. The fruit inspecting religious charlatans would have to see King David as a parody of sin, because look at the level of evil he sank to. Points such as King David who though having an entire harem of women had to plot the assassination of Uriah to continue sleeping with his wife Bathsheba (2Sam11:2-17).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |